Suddenly there are signs of pressure in the Indonesia
economy. Until recently, the economy seemed to be doing well. But growth is now
slowing, inflation is rising, the balance of payments is under pressure, and
the value of the rupiah has slumped. Why the change in economic fortunes?
The latest developments in Indonesian markets reflect both
long-term and short-term factors.
The longer-term factors include a range of issues which have
been a source of comment within Indonesia for some time. At the broadest level,
something of an inward looking mood appears to have been influencing policies
during the past year or so. Senior policy makers have emphasised that the broad
approach being promoted, which is one of looking for ways to strengthen
Indonesian industries, is not protectionist. Policies of this kind, policy
makers argue, will strengthen the resilience of the Indonesian economy by
providing greater economic security which will shield both Indonesian producers
and consumers from the vagaries of uncertain international conditions.
There is much to be said for the long-term aim of building
up domestic Indonesian industries and emphasising key goals such as food and
energy security. But a number of well-publicised policies during the past few
years have been somewhat interventionist, and have arguably had an anti-market
flavour about them.
Policies in the mining sector, for example, have not been
especially successful in promoting growth. Output has been falling steadily for
over a decade in the oil sector, a previous source of strong exports and
government revenues during the 1980s and 1990s. Indonesia, formerly a
significant oil-exporting nation, has now become an oil importer and the rising
levels of oil imports have become a significant strain on the balance of
payments.
In the non-oil mining sectors, investors view some key
policy approaches as being excessively interventionist. Mining firms in various
industries have been told to install smelters and to process their resources
before export. Government directives to this effect are expected to be
implemented regardless of whether additional processing in Indonesia is
profitable or not.
These directives, along with a range of other structural
policies in other sectors, appear to have had the unintended effect of holding
back the expansion of exports while adding to the national import bill.
In good times, when the international economy is strong and
when international financiers are keen to invest in emerging market economies,
developing countries such as Indonesia perhaps have room to take risks with
experimental structural policies. But when international conditions are more
difficult, markets and investors are less tolerant.
The short-term problem for Indonesia now is that markets
have suddenly turned less tolerant, due to three recent developments. First,
the slowdown of economic growth in China has led to a fall in demand for
Indonesia’s exports. Second, US Fed chairman Ben Bernanke’s indications that
the remarkable period of loose monetary policy in the US might be drawing to an
end has led to something of a global flight of capital from emerging markets.
And third, India’s current economic woes have led to concerns that these
problems might spread to other countries across the region through a process of
contagion, as was the case in the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997–98.
But it is too early to see the current developments in
Indonesian markets as a threat to longer-term growth. For one, policy makers
have responded swiftly. On 23 August, Indonesia announced a package of
comprehensive fiscal and monetary policies as a response to the pressures in
the financial and trade markets. And, to strengthen the package, just a few
days ago (29 August) the central bank Bank Indonesia increased interest rates
to 7 per cent.
For another, Indonesia has a very strong team of economic
policy makers. Vice President Boediono has many years of experience in both
monetary and fiscal policy matters, including during the Asian Financial Crisis.
He is supported by the Minister of Finance, Dr Chatib Basri, and the Governor
of Bank Indonesia, Agus Martowardojo, both of whom are known for their firm
commitment to sound economic policies.
Finally, some of the short-term pressures that Indonesia is
facing may even prove to be a blessing in disguise. The recent period of strong
growth during the past few years may have lulled some policy makers in
Indonesia into believing that economic success is guaranteed. If so, an
economic rap over the knuckles to remind them that international markets are
both fickle and powerful may be no bad thing.
Source:
http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/09/01/is-the-indonesian-economy-in-trouble/
5W 1H
What The short term problem for Indonesia now?
The
slowdown of economic growth in China has led to a fall in demand for
Indonesia’s exports.
· Why Policies in the mining sector have not been
especially successful in promoting growth?
Formerly a significant
oil-exporting nation, has now become an oil importer and the rising levels of
oil imports have become a significant strain on the balance of payments.
·
Where the financial crisis in the year
1997-1998?
In Asia.
·
Who economic policy makers?
Vice President Boediono, He is
supported by the Minister of Finance, Dr Chatib Basri, and the Governor of Bank
Indonesia, Agus Martowardojo.
·
When Indonesia announced a package fiscal and
monetary policies?
On 23 August.
·
How the pressures short term that Indonesia is
facing?
The recent period of strong growth
during the past few years.
My Opinoin
Government should be able
firm commitment economic policies. Make monetary and fiscal policy.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar